We are delighted to share our third piece of writing for our exhibition Not as it Seems as Rebecca Sharp delves deeper into the process of writing.
Please take time to read Rebecca's work, while enjoying the work of the artists
View the exhibition here
Not as
it Seems:
Jai Llewellyn, Sharon Quigley, James Lumsden, Ian Kinnear
24 Feb – 24
March
Now that I’m into the rhythm of the residency, I’m starting
to think about ways it might open out… and how I might communicate that through
these postings.
– I recognised in myself a creeping pressure
(self-imposed) to just ‘write another poem’ for each exhibition. That would be no bad thing of course, but
what about all the dreaming, drafting and redrafting that goes on? What happens to all the mistakes; the
thoughts or phrases you
I was walking along to the gallery, thinking about
sketchbooks. Most visual artists have a
sketchbook practice. Certainly, as a
writer my house is stuffed full of
books
– I usually have several on the go at one time.
I dedicate one to each new project and tend to keep them for sentimental
rather than practical reasons. I started
to wonder how the processes of development and experimentation might be
different for visual artists and writers; and how they might be the same.
I remembered a collaborative project I made with artist Anna King in 2013: UNMAPPED – poems and
paintings.
Process and communication were at the heart of this project
– I was living in Liverpool at the time, Anna in the Scottish Borders; so it
wasn’t possible for us to meet as regularly as we’d have liked. But that ended up giving us the heart of the
project. I suggested we write to each
other and document the exchange of material between us as part of the creative
process. Anna suggested that we send the
actual sketchbook that she would be using for the project. Her suggestion afforded me my first proper
insight into the artistic practice of keeping a sketchbook.
My understanding of sketchbooks is that they are a way of
documenting mistakes or happy accidents as much as discoveries; being able to
look back and see a process taking shape that’s probably impossible to see in
the moment. I suppose a similar process
for writers is drafting and editing – though we rarely keep those early
versions! Maybe it’s something about the
aesthetics of a sketchbook being a pleasurable visual object (or at the very
least, interesting); whereas reading unformed writing tends not to have a great
deal to offer.
So with all this on my mind, imagine my joy in reading Ian
Kinnear’s Artist Statement, where he draws a parallel between his own process
and that of writing:
‘Working on a subject, I may produce a series of paintings, refining
each attempt as in the drafting of a poem.’
, and saw their
individual processes reflected in their work; the more I sensed that this was
what I should focus on here. And what
better time to be thinking of such things than in response to an exhibition of
My notes are here, with my own ‘final’ piece to follow…
followed
by my own fragments (RS)
1. Jai Llewellyn
personal experience
truth via a material
and process that is in constant flux
concrete yet fluid,
resolved yet open
to point to a solution
that is never quite reached
the paintings are
laboured
everything needs to
happen in the painting
mistakes and workings
to be present
when a painting is
finished, a part of me has left
…
RS:
‘to point to a solution that is never quite reached’ – importance
of experience and process over end result
‘a part of me has left’.
This doesn’t sound like a loss… ‘has left’ – of its own volition –
natural, inevitable, an independent entity.
The idea of letting go - versus attachment. Which is more productive? The productivity trap.
the artwork. Reaching an
understanding – letting each other go…
Titles! –
Bone / I have no words / Dirty Rainbow /
Half is Much / Enough is Enough / Neither up nor down / Left too soon /
Clueless Wonder / Redder Sky Greener Grass / Road Ahead / Two steps forward /
Gold Dust On My Feet
2. Sharon Quigley
topographic
diagrammatic
micrographic
cellular structures
physicality, intimacy
and sensation
…
RS:
Contour lines – maps, distance, scale… relativity,
subjectivity
Currents, currency
Cloud cover
Terrain (topography)
Nursery blue
Lines like tiny stiches – in and out – with softer
cloud-forms, spillages
Darts
Vascular
Infection
Inside and outside – known and unknown, forms talked about
in Latin and Greek
Proprioception
The point where forms meet: stitch and cloud – inner
boundaries, tensions
Trypophobia – fear of the image of small repeated holes or
circles
Titles – Sabril /
Peganone / Fold Unfold / Keppra / Lyrica / Plasmon
3. James Lumsden
light and depth
dragged, pulled or
squeegeed
implements
chance and
deliberation
strata
pentimenti
seductive surfaces
rich in incident
suspended in medium
turned into something
poetic
…
RS:
physicality
acrylic – plasticity
glowing
surface and depth, high shine and deep layers (pentimenti)…
inviting a physical response
artist and viewer are also ‘suspended in medium’
4. Ian Kinnear
I work freely
time and place
the drafting of a poem
…
RS:
They look like dreams I’ve had
Drawn into a memory, looking for a familiar colour or form –
pareidolia, a pheasant
Tail feather
River / birds
The Beat – talking to two women in the gallery, I mentioned
the title
. I loved both the work and the title. Since I’d seen pheasants in a couple of the
other works, I assumed that was the meaning of the ‘beat’. The women corrected me, saying the ‘beat’ is
also the stretch of river used for fishing.
We had a good conversation.
*final, for now… I plan to keep revisiting what I write and
gather it all together in some form at the end of the residency – at that
stage, I’ll edit the truly final versions.